Public Decisions

To help refine your searches, follow these rules to get more accurate results.

  • Limit the Dates - Set a date range to limit the number of results to be within that range.
  • If a term must be in all results, prepend +. (e.g. +required)
  • If a term must not be in any results, prepend -. (e.g. -banned)
  • If matches can start with a term or partial word, append *. (e.g. partial*)
  • Search for an exact word match of words or phases, enclose them in ". (e.g. "exact phrase")
  • Limit the Decision Type - Restricts the search to only the Decisions of that type.
  • Decision # 31/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for crowns on teeth 14 and 15.

  • Decision # 30/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 29/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after February 15, 2022.

  • Decision # 28/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s permanent partial impairment rating and monetary award have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 27/24

    Issue: Date of Accident - February 2, 2017: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - January 5, 2018: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - May 8, 2019: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.Date of Accident - March 23, 2021: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 26/24

    Issue: Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the proposed left knee surgery.

  • Decision # 25/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after November 7, 2022.

  • Decision # 24/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to medical aid benefits after June 13, 2022; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after September 2, 2022.

  • Decision # 23/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker's current independent living allowance has been correctly determined;2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to a replacement toilet; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to coverage for Robaxacet medication; 4. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's vestibular symptoms as being related to the compensable injury; 5. Whether or not the worker's physical permanent partial impairment rating should be re-assessed at this time; 6. Whether or not the worker’s psychological permanent partial impairment rating should be re-assessed at this time; and 7. Whether or not a medical review panel should be convened pursuant to subsection 67(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 22/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker’s average earnings have been correctly calculated.

  • Decision # 21/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits for the period June 1, 2023 to June 30, 2023.

  • Decision # 20/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 19/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after November 18, 2019; and 2. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's recurrent right elbow difficulties after March 2, 2020.

  • Decision # 18/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 17/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits after August 9, 2022.

  • Decision # 16/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the medication Lorazepam after July 30, 2022; 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits with the accident employer after October 18, 2022; 3. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid wage loss benefits in the amount of $124,628.40; 4. Whether or not the worker is required to repay the full amount of the overpayment; and 5. Whether or not an administrative penalty should be assessed against the worker for contravention of section 19(4) of the Act.

  • Decision # 15/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further physiotherapy treatment; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits after February 15, 2023.

  • Decision # 14/24

    Issue: Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits in relation to the April 13, 2023 accident.

  • Decision # 13/24

    Issue: Whether or not financial responsibility should be accepted for a swim spa.

  • Decision # 12/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker has been overpaid $122,285.32 for 2019, 2020 and 2021; 2. Whether or not the overpayment must be repaid; 3. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss benefits; and 4. Whether or not the worker is entitled to vocational rehabilitation services.

  • Decision # 11/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not the worker is entitled to benefits after April 21, 2021 in relation to their right shoulder complaints; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to further benefits in relation to their head and neck complaints.

  • Decision # 10/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 09/24

    Issue: 1. Whether or not responsibility should be accepted for the worker's lung condition as being a consequence of the November 15, 2021 accident; and 2. Whether or not the worker is entitled to wage loss and medical aid benefits.

  • Decision # 08/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.

  • Decision # 07/24

    Issue: Whether or not the claim is acceptable.